Groundspeak Portal

It failed in peer review.

Thanks.

I hope someone in the group stops by to provide some insight as to how the voting went. I'm curious as to which of the published Peer Review criteria were most commonly used as a reason for 'nay' votes.

Or if some other criteria was used.

The most prevalent comments on the NAY's that I remembered seeing was:

1.  Not an Appropriate subject for a waymark........or something to that effect.

2.  Not Interesting for a category.

There were a lot of positive comments, but the percentage wasn't high enough for an Accept.

 

Yeah it did fail in peer review, but not by much. Over half voted yeah. Shame there were a lot of abstained. Just goes to show Waymarking is still mostly us Americans with out potty issues.

Now if only the nay-sayers were as vocal with all the franchises... Those categories are what keeps the cachers from crossing over to the darkside (we have cookies).

team farkle 7:

Now if only the nay-sayers were as vocal with all the franchises... Those categories are what keeps the cachers from crossing over to the darkside (we have cookies).

I believe I was fairly vocal on those too

    
          And now  the last word! ~ Really!

Jake39:

Does that thing got a roof?

Yes it does have a roof... you can see it in the photo by Jake39 if you look carefully on the edge of the beams.

Or



I "went" there too. Flower Pot Island I mean.

BQ