The category description includes grasslands although the title says forests. This makes this category proposal even more difficult to distinguish from other public lands categories.
Reading the category description, it is impossible to tell whether or not it is intended to be U.S. Forests only or worldwide. The paragraphs in it seem to alternate between U.S.-only versus global.
The terms Park and Forest are clear in the U.S. only because one is run by Interior and the other is run by Commerce. In other nations, this difference isn't necessarily clear.
The statement on cellphone pictures is likely to be anachronistic soon. What is a cellphone camera like 3 years from now? It's perhaps better to just say if your photo is lousy, we will reject your waymark.
In a big Forest with 9 highway entrances, how many waymarks for it are allowed? The description doesn't state a rule explicitly on this.