I have a question related to this, and I have also got a waymark disapproved due to my principles on this matter.
The category was military bases. (not pointing fingers as this is not the point) My stance was that you can not take pictures of the front gate. It is a security issue taking pictures of any security measures on a military base. I was in the Army, and during my service, one thing that would have raised a flag would be someone taking pictures of our base.
The counter point to me from the category is that you can do anything from public property.
The initial post reminded me of this situation. Secure locations will do what they have to do to keep themselves secure.
I was in Oklahoma City taking pictures of the Federal Courthouse, and I was approached by security. I was asked for ID, who I was, what I was photographing and why. I told them the truth and nothing came of it, other than a little inconvienince and a good conversation.
My question is, with a bit of knowledge, what is the line that a person can go without getting arrested. The front gate of Fort Leavenworth states no photography. All federal facilities state this. I know that a person can take pictures from public property and no one can take your pictures. But who has the money not to give up the pictures rather than facing a night in jail. So what is the answer on staying out of jail and getting the picture you want/need?