A couple of recent forum posts have reiterated the suggested style of facts and information in the waymark description and opinions and feelings in the visit log.
Realize that everyone who sees these web pages, might not a waymarker. Search engines are now finding waymarking web pages and presenting them to non-waymarkers as the result of a search. Hopefully these pages present useful, well-written and factual information to the searcher, even though they're not a waymarker or have any idea what waymarking is. When they read "Happy WMin' ", they probably don't have a clue what this means. Heck, I even had to think about it when I first saw it.
If a researcher or college student views a waymark as a result of a search and sees spelling errors and grammar problems, it could color their opinion of our site as a whole. One of the reasons wikipedia has become such a respected site, is because the quality of most pages, not in a draft state, is very high.
Many waymarkers already draw material from wikipedia, because the material there is well written. Wikipedia allows its community to easily edit and correct spelling and grammar errors of other well-intentioned contributors. This results in a degree of uniformity and quality across the site.
As waymark page creators, the individual poster here holds the primary responsibility for the content, spelling and grammar of their work. The category managers could edit contributions, but I don't see that happening a lot. Sometimes they may point out things that they'd like the poster to correct, after the the approval.
The coaching and suggestions of others is the only collective editing power we have. I got coaching from several category managers when I began. I listened and adopted their styles. Later on, I found simple errors in the waymarks of others, including such things as the wrong state, impossible coordinates or even duplicate postings. I usually address it through a note to the originator and they have always fixed it and thanked me.
I think everyone here respects the work done by others. I wouldn't be contributing to this site, if I thought the site was crap. My desire is that every waymarker strives to create well written waymarks, do good research, and include nice pictures. Everyone here wants you to succeed.