jimbofish:IMO, there was nothing in the submitter's reply that should have annoyed you. The mistake was yours... apologise and correct it, and be more carefull next time.
I disagree. If cmelton14 was polite in his rejection, even if he was mistaken, the submitter had no need to get his hackels up. He should have simplely re-submitted stating where to find the requested information that was there the first time.
I have one awaiting approval (or denial) that was rejected in Fishing Holes because "normally fishing isn't allowed below dams". My picture clearly shows people fishing there and I asked for it to be reconsidered. It upset me that it was rejected but I see no need assualting the reviewer as he was polite in doing his job. And since this is a game, we have to remember that reviewing is a job so that the rest of us can play.
Fatcat