dunbar loop:I have tossed quite a few local historical group signs under the Signs of History category, so I'm not sure if this category is needed.
Can you mention what the criteria is in more detail?
Exactly. I have too, but there are others that don't have a sign with enough information (according to that category's guidelines) to qualify.
I can say that here in Korea, although there is an extensive numbering system for historic sites, both at the national and provincial level, there are still some worthy sites that don't fit the Korean Historic Sites category and don't have enough information on the sign for Signs of History, that could use a category such as this.
My main concern is that this might be too broad - with state park sites, town sites, historical society sites, and who knows what else. I think it would also be a challenge when casting such a broad net to define precisely what qualifies. The advantage of more specific categories is that the either qualify or they don't based on a numbering system, inclusion in a specific program, etc. I'm not saying this is an insurmountable challenge, but one that will take a lot of thought, planning and careful writing.
Let's see what you've got.