Groundspeak Portal

The Language of Location
Welcome to Groundspeak Portal Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Blogs Forums

U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

Last post 08-27-2009, 2:39 PM by Team Sieni. 7 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  08-27-2009, 5:22 AM 24494

    U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    This cat is currently up for review

    Does anyone agree with me that this is a case of unnecessary geographic restriction on a category.  If it were made global it would still not fall foul of prevalence criteria, and national, state even county intersections would be possible.  As it is there can only be maybe a couple of hundred of such points in the continental US itself, max.  I think it's a nice idea but too constrained.

    I know the global criterion can be argued til the cows come home.  Sometimes it's a good idea for organisational reasons - eg historical markers.  But I can't see how there are enough of these in the world to have a category restricted to just US states.

    It's a nice idea though, but IMHO "three border points" would be nicer.  It would need some kind of rule to avoid trivial organisational units.

     

  •  08-27-2009, 5:28 AM 24495 in reply to 24494

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    I believe the writeup says there are 60.

    Total agreement, and I recommended broadening it in my vote comment.
  •  08-27-2009, 6:36 AM 24498 in reply to 24495

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    I too think it should be broader. It doesn't need to include county/parish borders which are a subdivision of state but aren't most countries divided into states? I know Mexico is, and Germany is but not what they call them. Ireland has 30 counties which I believe are the only subdivisions of the country therefore equivalent to the US state. I see no reason to restrict it to just the US.

    Fatcat

  •  08-27-2009, 7:01 AM 24499 in reply to 24498

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    from the name of the thread itself it sounds like a good ole US Benchmark to me anyway....
  •  08-27-2009, 8:58 AM 24505 in reply to 24498

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    The UK a bit odd.  It's divided into four countries or nations (I'm not sure of the technically correct word) of England, Scotland, Wales and N Ireland.  The next level down  is the county of which there are quite a lot (30? 40?)  Some are quite small, some quite big.  They get changed periodically when the government wants to distract us all from something else.

    France has, I think, Departements (which has an accute accent on the first e, but I can't do that on my keyboard)

    Finland has provinces (six of them) - Laanit (there should be dots over those a's)

    Switzerland has Cantons (which mercifully don't have any accents on them at all) twenty-odd of them.

    I'm just rambling now.

  •  08-27-2009, 9:42 AM 24507 in reply to 24505

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    kinda reminds me of those search result overload commercials ive been seeing...
  •  08-27-2009, 11:58 AM 24511 in reply to 24494

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    I agree on this being too restrictive globally.  Not only are there only a limited number of these in the US many are not really easily reachable as they are located in the middle of rivers.
  •  08-27-2009, 2:39 PM 24522 in reply to 24511

    Re: U.S. Tri-state geodetic points

    The borders of Finland, Norway and Sweden meet at Kilpisjärvi. 

    http://www.kilpisjarvi.org/nahtavyydet_en.htm

    One day ...

     

     

View as RSS news feed in XML
Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems