ok, we are having a discussion. i want to reply to a note, but 'reply' goes to 'noreply@waymarking'.
here is the body of the email sent from a group member:
A member from the Recovered US Benchmarks group has sent your group a message.
'waymarker' says:
[insert words here]
[this message is a copy of the message you sent to your group members].
------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent without a return email address. You will need to respond to
this email through the Waymarking.com Web site. Visit http://www.waymarking.com
and log in to respond to the message from your "my account page".
Forward abuse complaints to: contact@waymarking.com
------
ok, i [just now] see where it says no return address given--havent we already had that discussion? not very visible is it?
i was going to just reply to him, but i was forced to go to the group page--now, do you see anything missing?
yes, you are right: shouldnt there at least be a link to the group? then at least i can get there directly, instead of using the waymarking.com link (at least that is in the email), and preforming other actions to navigate to the group.
speaking of group emails. shouldnt the system allow the group to have a @waymarking address?
thus:
a group member send a message. each other member can just hit reply (sending it to the group@waymarking), write their message, and sending it then sends it to the other members (ie: reply all).