|
|
Search
You searched for the word(s):
|
Showing page 1 of 5 (117 total posts)
< 1 second(s)
-
|
|
cache_test_dummies:In hindsight, it probably would have been better to have had this
discussion earlier, rather than the week before the release of an
update which challenges the current cultural mindset of
the community. It would have given us more time to adjust. I would encourage Groundspeak to continue to help us to better understand its ...
|
-
|
|
BruceS: jeremy:I guess I don't understand the point you are making. The new uncategorized waymark feature supports the ability to post an unfinished waymark in your queue. You can, at that point, either submit it as ''finished'' and make it public for someone to categorize it, or store it as ''unfinished'' until a category is available to ...
|
-
|
|
BruceS:And meritocracy will lead to mediocrity j/k. However declaring that they are now the community's does not reward the initial contributor his ''ownership'' has now been stripped along with a sense of pride that may come with it.We're rewarding people for discovery, not ownership. Historically, humans have ...
|
-
|
|
BruceS: jeremy: BruceS:If this is the intent then make it so that I can post them in this holding place and when the category is created only I can submit it... The current implementation only foster disharmony when someone ''poaches'' a waymark I have put in the holding area waiting for a category.The unfinished waymark feature provides ...
|
-
|
|
BruceS:I don't think there is any feeling of owning the location which is quite evident by multiple waymarkers submitting the same location in different categories. However there is an ownership of the waymark submission itself. It is that ownership which helps to insure quality of the waymarks submitted. I disagree in that, by ...
|
-
|
|
BruceS:If this is the intent then make it so that I can post them in this holding place and when the category is created only I can submit it... The current implementation only foster disharmony when someone ''poaches'' a waymark I have put in the holding area waiting for a category.The unfinished waymark feature provides this already. You ...
|
-
|
|
I wanted to follow up to explain the intent of the new feature. It was not, as many posts are focusing, meant as a way for newbies to easily post their waymark even if they didn't know the category exists. The intent was to create a way for people to post locations that don't have categories at all.Right now you can either post a waymark in an ...
|
-
|
|
norstar:
I find the idea of trading or voluntarily giving waymarks to other players intriguing and needed. Eventually, people will leave or maybe GroundSpeak will receive a notice saying that 'so-and-so has just passed away.' If there is no way to transfer ownership (as currently understood) to another player, the waymark ...
|
-
|
|
the blue quasar:It has always been my understanding that if I create a listing, all of the content including my text and images are protected under the Waymarking Terms of Use and likely by intellectual property laws. With that in mind I have been open to allowing Category Officers the right to make minor edits to my works. Now it appears that ...
|
-
|
|
Here's the inspiration for the category. He chose Dot Com Tourist Spots which may even be better, though I do like Breakthroughs of the Information Age. Where Bill Gates used to eat burgers doesn't really fit in the category but I can live with that.
|
-
|
|
This originated from a local tech blog who wanted to document locations that someone would be interested in finding in the tech industry. Places like the garage where the first Apple was built fits in this category. A geek was initially a way to direct folks to the right type of place. It's like the definition of porn is that I know it when I see ...
|
-
|
|
haunthunters:Geocachers are concerned about image. The number one unspoken rule in the entire geocaching kingdom is that you try your best not to do anything that would give Geocaching a bad name.The physical aspect of geocaching makes it more prone to regulation. This is the biggest reason why geocachers are so concerned with negative stereotypes
|
-
|
|
I'd join as an officer if you created one. Creating categories hasn't been my forte.
|
-
|
|
I like the idea. I agree it should be a subscription-based magazine cover not a real estate guide or other freebie zine.There are a lot of National Geographic magazines but I don't think they should necessarily be excluded.
|
-
|
|
I wasn't planning on starting the category, but this article and some of the comments made me think that it was ripe for a category. London is one of the most CCTV filled areas in the world. It would make sense to counter the Big Brother campaign with a list of them.Is there a law about watching the watchers?
|
-
|
|
I think bunkers should have their own category. They're definitely different enough.I'll add that there are lots of places like Fort Warden here in Washington State that I'd love to add the bunkers into the different waymark category. Also as long as the alternate term relates to blockhouses (using Wikipedia as a guide) there's no issue with ...
|
-
|
|
s5280ft:Would you want to include pillboxes?The expectation would be to only mark them in this category if they are called blockhouses by some kind of plaque or local description. Just because they are primarily above ground it doesn't mean it is a blockhouse. Nor does it matter if the blockhouse is on the coast as long as it is called one.
|
-
|
|
fishingwishing:There already is a 'Martello Towers' category - would that be redundant? No. It wouldn't.
|
-
|
|
0ccam:How about ''Preserved Architectural Remainders''?''Remains'' in its noun form refers to organic material, like plants or animals.Remainder: 1. something that remains or is left(Dictionary.com)How about ''Preserved Architectural Reminders''?It's close to yours but reminders could make more sense (if I'm not too late).
|
-
|
|
Now recruiting for the Blockhouse Defenders group. I saw one at a cache on Whitbey Island over the weekend and thought this category was worthwhile. More information on blockhouses can be found on Wikipedia.I am embarrased to say that I thought that blockhouses stored ice before seeing one. Families on Whitbey Island are proud of their blockhouses ...
|
-
|
|
TheBeanTeam:Ok you've got me interested in the last sentence in that topic. ''....you may be able to skin other categories to appear as their own site as well''. What might I be able to do with categories I have the ability to edit or would this just be an ability of Groundspeak? Give us a ''maybe you can'' type explanation of this possible ...
|
-
|
|
I think I sorted out the issue. Let me know if this happens again.
|
-
|
|
I thought it was pretty well understood these days that being listed in one category doesn't preclude it from being listed elsewhere. That's bothersome.
|
-
|
|
I added a new requirement that movie locations should have the actor in the shot for it to be listed in the category. Recently we have had a rash of things like the Golden Gate Bridge, a common shot to indicate the location of the movie. I believe the intent was to actually show a shot of a scene filmed on location instead of marking stock ...
|
-
|
|
The original intent of the movie locations category was only to list movie film locations and not tv locations. At some point both types were added. I would like to propose bringing the category back to the original concept and creating a new category for tv locations.I believe there are more than enough locations to support TV and Film location ...
|
1
|
|
|