|
Showing page 1 of 6 (135 total posts)
< 1 second(s)
-
|
|
The category description includes grasslands although the title says forests. This makes this category proposal even more difficult to distinguish from other public lands categories.
Reading the category description, it is impossible to tell whether or not it is intended to be U.S. Forests only or worldwide. The paragraphs in it seem to ...
|
-
|
|
Occasionally, people try to waymark unusually-shaped trees in the Exceptional Trees category which is only for exceptionally large or old trees.
Exceptionally large or old trees are great of course, but unusually shaped trees can be more photogenic and special to find and visit.
This would not be an easy category because it would be somewhat ...
|
-
|
|
I voted ''yea''. I have a question though. Does this category include raw seafood specialty places where one could by raw fish, or smoked fish, or raw shellfish for cooking, or is this just for mammal meats?
|
-
|
|
Interesting category idea!
I suggest a minimum number of steps from the start point to the finish point. There are many places where there are maybe 3 steps for some small topological change. A bunch of those waymarked in the category would tend to bury the excellent examples shown in this thread.
I liked the idea that the ...
|
-
|
|
Hmm, interesting theory. I don't know how to determine
that. I guess I should use another editor and do the same
cropping with it and see what happens on a waymark.
|
-
|
|
BruceS: black dog trackers:Why I very rarely vote no -
1) Judging 'too regional' is difficult. Many of us are in the
U.S. or Canada and they are relatively huge countries. Waymarking
was started/defined by including a McDonalds category made by
TPTB. McDonalds isn't commonly everywhere in the world so why
deny other ...
|
-
|
|
It saves a photo, not just a thumbnail.
It only does the thin line thing when I crop a picture and thereby change the width-to-height ratio.
|
-
|
|
Why I very rarely vote no -
1) Judging 'too regional' is difficult. Many of us are in the
U.S. or Canada and they are relatively huge countries. Waymarking
was started/defined by including a McDonalds category made by
TPTB. McDonalds isn't commonly everywhere in the world so why
deny other countries and continents their ...
|
-
|
|
TheBeanTeam: black dog trackers: (There
is something funny about the waymarking site's thumbnail versions - any
cropped picture shows up as a thin line in a black rectangle, but the
large view is OK. Or is it the editor I'm using?)I don't think it is your editor. Unless there are a lot of us using the same one. I use Picasa. You? I use ...
|
-
|
|
My main objective in taking a picture for making a waymark is to follow the rules. Secondarily, I like to get a shot that isn't ruined by something like bad reflections, shooting into the sun, shooting from my car window and getting part of the car in the shot, etc. My third priority is to get my picture taken without calling undue ...
|
-
|
|
I certainly don't want any photos to be hidden. I want to see what people have discovered, without having to do any clicking.
The main discovery aspect of Waymarking is to discover things to waymark.
After a place is waymarked, then the discovery is to go there and discover some aspect that the waymark's page itself doesn't ...
|
-
|
|
No doubt there is an interest in a car-hop category. However, that should not deter you from the present process for the Sonics category. The interesting thing about a car-hop/drive-in category is to have a place to waymark non-chain car-hop/drive-ins. The way to do that is to establish both categories; Sonic and ...
|
-
|
|
Nice to have a little amusement while doing a peer review.
Great category!
|
-
|
|
An independent (non-chain) car hops category would be good, and so
would a Sonic category. Both categories should be started.
|
-
|
|
I wish there were some sonics around here. The nearest is many miles away.
I think you should continue with the sonics category. There seems to be a misunderstanding about global versus non-global. What it really means in waymarking is that a category should not be written to explicitly exclude places outside of its usual ...
|
-
|
|
Heh, I was hoping to pull you out of the woodwork.
|
-
|
|
OK, I am getting weary of declining historic trees at the Exceptional Trees category. The submitted trees do have some age and size of course, being historic, but are not known for being either exceptionally large or old, which the Exceptional Trees category requires. Of course, a few trees are both known for being exceptional in ...
|
-
|
|
Yes, either that or one of those little yellow triangles somewhere on
the My Categories page (which ought to have links to the categories'
forums!!!).
|
-
|
|
I must admit that I don't keep up with all the waymarking posts.
I read titles and don't open most of them, so the un-read list for me
is 95% redundant, since I know there are many unread by me, so I'm not
in the habit of looking at it. That is a good passive solution,
but too passive I think.
|
-
|
|
Waymarking has a forum for each category (I think). Some of mine
I haven't looked at in a year. Some I've never looked at.
No problem, I'm almost positive there's no posts for them.
There's no index for them that I can find. They seem to be hidden
in the shadows of waymarking. The only way to even see them is
|
-
|
|
I wonder if a Historic Trees category could be 'put' in more than one place in the directory.
|
-
|
|
When logging a benchmark on the geocaching benchmark area, checking the
box called ''Add a waypoint to the log'' causes an instant re-formatting
of the ''Post a new log'' form.
I would like it very much (and so would my backlog) if the ''Add New XXX
Waymark'' form would have a box labeled: ''I will be uploading [ ]
pictures'', and ...
|
-
|
|
I'm assuming that the benchmarking area will have it's own skin and community site separate from the new Geocaching.com site. (?) That would be logical, I think.
|
-
|
|
Waymarking is, thanks to Groundspeak's liberal design, quite a bit like what we want it to be! Some people like the yellow-pages kind of categories. (Collect 'em all, cover your town with waymarks, etc.!) Why attempt to deny them their fun by making a declaration of what you think Waymarking isn't? As has been said many ...
|
-
|
|
Cool idea !
A few ideas come to mind. I didn't search just now, so I don't know if there are already categories for Zoo or Petting Zoo. If not, these should exist.
Your idea is similar to Petting Zoo - those places like pumkin farms or corn mazes etc. that have a section where you can buy 25¢ worth of animal food and feed some animals
|
1 ...
|