|
Showing page 1 of 12 (279 total posts)
< 1 second(s)
-
|
|
No. However recently I had another Armchair Waymarker. I just figured that he or she wanted attention so I just deleted the log without posting anything on the Forum. I do not see the point. It is not like they get credit for Geocaching Finds.
Some waymarkers complain about the photo requirement but it does keep down the ...
|
-
|
|
May 15, 2009The Director of the National Park Service is pleased to send you thefollowing announcements and actions on properties for the National Registerof Historic Places. For further information contact Edson Beall via voice(202) 354-2255, or E-mail: <Edson_Beall@nps.gov> This and past WeeklyLists are also available here: ...
|
-
|
|
Proposed Waymark:
May 15, 2009The Director of the National Park Service is pleased to send you thefollowing announcements and actions on properties for the National Registerof Historic Places. For further information contact Edson Beall via voice(202) 354-2255, or E-mail: <Edson_Beall@nps.gov> This and past WeeklyLists are also ...
|
-
|
|
rose red:
E.G. Look at the map in the Waymark-description.
E.G. Take the cords and put them in ''Fly To'' in Google Earth.
Both of these are based on accurate coordinates. The coordinates for one of the three posted Waymarks ends in 00.000.
Of course, there are Waymarks that give the street, town, zip, etc. so a GPS would ...
|
-
|
|
A Waymarker may not have a camera however if the Waymarker does not have a GPS how do they find the ''... unique and interesting locations in the world''??
In this case the Waymarker has a GPS (looks like a Garmin 60CSx) and a camera at least to post a Waymark. There are no photos in the other two ...
|
-
|
|
''The off-leash dog areas cat doesn't require a photo. They are happy to know the locations and descriptions of off-leash dog areas. I've had a couple of visitors recently that didn't provide a photo, as they don't have a camera. I told them if their log was good I wouldn't require a photo.''
The Waymarker has a camera and a GPS which was ...
|
-
|
|
Received this morning: ''no photo, ok to delete. was not waymarking when I was there.''
|
-
|
|
''What did he answered you, when you wrote to him first (before writing about it here in Forum)?''
No response.
|
-
-
|
|
sbcamper has created three Waymarks -- two with no photographs and one with a photograph taken from a vehicle. And has logged over 100 visits in three months with no apparent photographs.
http://www.waymarking.com/users/profile.aspx?f=1&guid=94ea5142-ed1c-4b2b-b277-92579878574d&full=False&mypage=0
|
-
|
|
Proposed Waymark for a Waymarker with the coordinates and photographs:
National Register Weekly Posting 05/08/2009
NEVADA, CLARK COUNTY,''Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas'' Sign, The,Las Vegas Blvd., in public right of way, approx. .5 mi. S. of intersection with Russell Rd.,Paradise Township, 09000284,LISTED, 5/01/09
Listing is available ...
|
-
|
|
Proposed Waymark: National Register Weekly Posting 05/08/2009
NEVADA, CLARK COUNTY,''Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas'' Sign, The,Las Vegas Blvd., in public right of way, approx. .5 mi. S. of intersection with Russell Rd.,Paradise Township, 09000284,LISTED, 5/01/09
Complete listing is available here: http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/nrlist.htm
|
-
|
|
I never noticed the button feature until you wrote the post. Learned something new!!
|
-
|
|
We were discussing KWatson0013 who joined Waymarking on March 6th and since then visited over 360 Waymarks with no photographs where required and only brief comments. I do not understand why anyone would want to rack up visits just to rack up visits. It's not like it counts as ''Finds'' on Geocaching.
|
-
|
|
I have been receiving NRHP weekly posting for quite some time. It dawned on me this afternoon that other Waymarkers might be interested in receiving weekly postings.
The Director of the National Park Service is pleased to send you thefollowing announcements and actions on properties for the National Registerof Historic Places. For further ...
|
-
|
|
Your posting gave me quite a chuckle!!
|
-
|
|
You are right. The photos that he/she submitted if any would be added to the gallery of the waymark that he/she visited.
|
-
|
|
Perhaps you could just set aside a time at the end of the day or the end of week to check your e-mails when you would not feel so overwhelmed and simply ignore the e-mails the rest of the time irregardless of when the e-mails are sent. Also you might mention in your logs that you want a delayed ''Thanks'' ...
|
-
|
|
There are 122 pages of photos in my gallery. There are no photos in KWatson0013's gallery even though he/she made over 334 visits in three weeks. Surely some of those Categories/Waymarks required photographs.
|
-
|
|
http://www.waymarking.com/users/profile.aspx?f=1&guid=d8ac9fba-08d0-441c-9628-7699d7284915&gid=3
There are no photos in his gallery.
|
-
|
|
Hmmmm... That sound exactly like something that I would write however it would not be automated. The same message (with a change in the title) would be repeated if the Waymarker had visited several of my waymarks in the same area. What would you have wanted instead??
|
-
|
|
Please post an example of an automated ''thank you for visiting'' e-mail. I thank every Waymarker and Geocacher that finds my Waymarks or Geocaches. It is a standard format: ''Thank you for visiting my waymark -- (the name of the waymark). Rose Red (Maureen) or ''Thank you for finding my historical geocache -- (the name of the ...
|
-
|
|
True. A lot of the info/thoughts could go into a well written log.
|
-
|
|
There are a number of Categories that it is just too much of a hassle to contibute to.
|
-
|
|
I resize my digital images during export to 640 pixels x 480 pixels .jpg however I do not resize print photos or documents that I have scanned.
|
1 ...
|