Groundspeak Portal

I messed around with the archiving bit, and I must say that I wish there was an option, at least for premium members, to turn on and off archived waymarks. This would allow a waymarker to take out archived waymarks if they are looking for something to actually visit, but if they are just doing some online viewing to look at stuff they could still ...

I don't know, I guess I just don't understand why it is so terrible to have categories where waymarks actually fit in with the category. That's just my deal though and this is for everyone so if everyone is still against archiving despite the fact that they have made archiving real, then whatever.

Actually I was just reading through the waymarking.com release notes.''- Added a new waymark status: Archived. Now you can archive a waymark or delete it. Archive would be used for waymarks which are seasonal, for instance. You can always unarchive a waymark, but you can't undelete one. You may find that some previously deleted waymarks ...

I agree with Bruce, this was too all inclusive for me and still that last paragraph reads to me to be that this category is for waymarking everything in the middle east. I don't mind the idea of historic sites for the middle east, in fact I like it, but it is very all encompassing as is.

Ahh thanks for the satellite. I really do like this idea though yeah it may not be incredibly prevalent... still is cool, if you could find more examples from elsewhere I think this is great. I also think you almost need to require the satellite image of it to get the impact of it, but that isn't hard to do. I have a feeling there are far more ...

Btw, I don't behoove that others may disagree and while I can even see to some extent that perhaps this category isn't interesting because apparently animals are not interesting to some... ummmm the following denial caught me off guard.''Vote: DenyComments:None''Apparently reading isn't a strong suit to some, now granted the likeliness of this ...

I like the idea, would obviously need to ensure that onramps wouldn't be included. Given that the first picture was basically a bridge under a bridge that brings up the question if that sort of thing is allowed. The main reason I ask is because I know larger cities have that quite frequently (Milwaukee in particular seems rather bad at these types ...

Not including plants was a the request of someone else when I was throwing around this subject on the boards about 6 weeks ago when yes many of these here comments would have been far more helpful=/ Someone else was going to head up Red List Plants in a separate category essentially is your answer.In defense of archiving. I included that because I ...

globetrotters.us: Razak:This and worse has crossed my mind believe me... however, I still believe in the idea of awareness of the animals and I also don't want to limit it to captivity because that is already covered essentially by zoos and I think that isn't what I am hoping for out of this either. However, whether this gets in or not I will put ...

This and worse has crossed my mind believe me... however, I still believe in the idea of awareness of the animals and I also don't want to limit it to captivity because that is already covered essentially by zoos and I think that isn't what I am hoping for out of this either. However, whether this gets in or not I will put something in about being ...

I too think unique clocks (not that the clock is unique but that in tells the time of something unique) and counters would be cool for categories.

I said nay and put in pretty much the same as above. I am sure they intend better than to have Targets, wal-marts and Michaels (although I think Michael's is actually a tweener here), but they did not word it as such so I voted it down. I do hope they correct it because I have been traveling and found really cool scrapbooking stores that I think ...