|
|
Search
You searched for the word(s):
|
< 1 second(s)
-
|
|
My category was denied in peer review. I understand it being denied due to it being to specific an area, not a problem.
But the other reason given most often was because they think it would fit into the Sign of History.... which, if they actually had read the description they would have seen it would not fit that category since it is for more ...
|
-
|
|
Thanks for the explanation but the ''other monuments and plaques'' category is not just for signs of history... as I have said before, and as the category explains, it can include education, significant natural areas, conservation, etc. The category itself is pretty broad. And the waymarks do not fit into the two other Ontario categories that ...
|
-
|
|
I understand the some people would like to limit the number of categories that are available but there are many that are more specific than mine that pertains to a large province... there are categories that are for just Springfield, Missouri (2 that I saw on a quick glance), there is one for historical markers for just the state of Alaska, I ...
|
-
|
|
Thanks for the input but my category '' other monuments or plaques'' does not just include subjects of history... there are many subjects... it could be an enviromental significant areas that has no reference to history.
It is also nice to have a category that is more specific to an area then just a catch-all that would cover ...
|
-
|
|
HI Everyone!
My first category is in Peer Review right now (until May 16). I would appreciate your support in getting it successfully through this step!
Thanks!
Brenda (aka brendah)
|
-
|
|
I am having a similar problem although it is for the Category Officer vote...
My category was up for Officer Vote but one officer could not get the vote in on time because of difficulties with submitting (he was continually getting an error message and it did not allow him to vote).
Then the voting time line for the officer vote was done last ...
|
|
|
|